they are from the Intro, locations are the harbor and the bank office
all 14 images:
http://www.khoefs.de/images/LL_wip/index.htm
examples:
![Image](http://www.khoefs.de/images/LL_wip/images/Klaus%20Hoefs%2015.jpg)
![Image](http://www.khoefs.de/images/LL_wip/images/Klaus%20Hoefs%2014.jpg)
![Image](http://www.khoefs.de/images/LL_wip/images/Klaus%20Hoefs%2018.jpg)
![Image](http://www.khoefs.de/images/LL_wip/images/Klaus%20Hoefs%2024.jpg)
One result of my former project "travel" (which I shut down) was that it doesn't work (or is too much labor) to animate highly detailed (in my case crosshatched) characters.Paul Fierlinger wrote:If I am presuming too much than I would have some doubts about how those richer drawings will come out in motion.
I agree. It is very important to keep the lines alive and have them breathing. Also the danger with crosshatching is to drive the whole thing to death - imo this can be seen at many dry-point-etchings. So I do the less controlled style with chaotic individual free strokes.Paul Fierlinger wrote:When they are filled out with buckets of paint they loose their built-in charm of dexterity and simplicity. If they are painted with textured brush strokes, they boil too much.
Sorry, I don't know what you mean with "slanted steeples", Can you please explain it a little more to me ?Paul Fierlinger wrote: Are your steeples in the BKG slanted?
Pablo Picasso i'd say... but hey... i don't have a foggy avatarKlaus Hoefs wrote: ...and Jules, what did you mean with PP ??? - did you mean PF ? what I (and others) were guessing ?
uugh! --- did Picasso ever made some homo-erotic paintings/drawings ??Klaus Hoefs wrote:Pablo Picasso i'd say
Leaning church towers, but at a new glance I see it was a stupid question. My problem is that I have just started using "no line" trifocals when I am working on my computers and have not yet adjusted to the annoying phenomenon that things can appear to be slanted when I am not looking at them directly, but from the side. I had your drawing on one computer, way to my side while I was writing on a monitor directly in front of me.Sorry, I don't know what you mean with "slanted steeples", Can you please explain it a little more to me ?
Actually Picasso didn't like men and drew them poorly, or tried avoiding drawing men altogether.Klaus Hoefs wrote:uugh! --- did Picasso ever made some homo-erotic paintings/drawings ??Klaus Hoefs wrote:Pablo Picasso i'd say
Can't remember one.
I have the very same problem with my new "work" glasses. My normal ones start getting into focus at about 20 cm, but when I draw on the Cintiq this is too exhausting, so I asked my opticion for a near-sighted version. But these have a very strong "slant" effect.Paul Fierlinger wrote:I have to turn my head more often but then I vomit all over my keyboards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Read ... _small.jpgKlaus Hoefs wrote:uugh! --- did Picasso ever made some homo-erotic paintings/drawings ??Klaus Hoefs wrote:Pablo Picasso i'd say
Can't remember one.
That must have been painted around the time PP decided he will turn to women for his painting subjects (and otherwise).Tantalus wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Read ... _small.jpgKlaus Hoefs wrote:uugh! --- did Picasso ever made some homo-erotic paintings/drawings ??Klaus Hoefs wrote:Pablo Picasso i'd say
Can't remember one.
Although i don't see this as homo-erotic, but neither do i see Klaus drawing as such.
Unless depicting man-bulls.Paul Fierlinger wrote:Actually Picasso didn't like men and drew them poorly, or tried avoiding drawing men altogether.Klaus Hoefs wrote:uugh! --- did Picasso ever made some homo-erotic paintings/drawings ??Klaus Hoefs wrote:Pablo Picasso i'd say
Can't remember one.